Uncle Entity wrote:Max using his gieger counter over the water... "Whats a little fall out"?
Fallout travel all around the world, as well as the "nuclear winter". But there was a LIMITED nuclear exchange between few nations. Australia wasn't one of them. It was just bombed out.
However, global climate had changed and Australia goes hit by hard rains and fallout, and experiences periodical nuclear winters.
In Australia, everything collapsed because people. No food, no money (useless), no energy. panic. Terror. Annihilation.
Fallout would disipate enough if it was a "limited" encounter as you say. It would not encircle the globe.
The guy with the water wouldve got the water from an area which was still affected by fallout, had fallout encircled the globe everyone would be dead within a matter of months from radiation poisoning.
The two mighty warrior tribes who went to war at the time could only be the USSR and the USA.
If we are to use "real world" parallels then the "bombing of Australia" using conventional weapons is not going to happen.
The USSR would not be able to field large quanties of bombers to fly 15000km to drop conventional bombs in large numbers on Australian cities. It is not possible to do so then and now. It is also not tactically intelligent should such a feat be tried.
At the time (1980s) the USSR and the USA had some 3500 wareheads attached to ICBMs, each!
It would be a matter or turning the key to launch... and then going to the shelter.
Planning to fly 15000km ???? The tanker support would be impossible for a start..... the flight crews wouldnt be able to stay awake either....
China back in the 1980s only fielded a handful of medium range bombers and would also not be able to reach us.
Indonesia, Malaysia aslo back in the 1980s had no capability to bombs us (and they still dont).