From The New York Times: An oral history of 'Fury Road'

Everything on the latest instalment - Mad Max Fury Road
User avatar
Taipan
Posts: 1693
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:14 am
Location: The Wasteland

Re: From The New York Times: An oral history of 'Fury Road'

Post by Taipan »

No, just the last 3 months of the shoot.

George Miller officially handed him over directorial duties, he even rough cut some action scenes because George had no idea where the actors should be or what the action even was. Actors didn't even want to deal with George in those last 3 months because he was 'not there'. The person who was given those duties worked 100 hour weeks, lost half of their original contract due to on-set duties colliding and at the end they were never paid for their work, they were not credited and they were even ostracized on purpose so the truth would never see the light of day. But that person has receipts just in case people say none of this happened. The entire situation is unfortunate but that's what it was like on the set, at least in that particular moment of filming.
At last the Vermin had inherited the Earth
AquaCola
Posts: 361
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:57 am

Re: From The New York Times: An oral history of 'Fury Road'

Post by AquaCola »

There's parts in Fury Road where it feels like another director was in charge because of tonal shifts. I wonder if he did those parts.
Stef-Man
Posts: 350
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:36 am
Location: Paris, France

Re: From The New York Times: An oral history of 'Fury Road'

Post by Stef-Man »

Taipan wrote:No, just the last 3 months of the shoot.

George Miller officially handed him over directorial duties, he even rough cut some action scenes because George had no idea where the actors should be or what the action even was. Actors didn't even want to deal with George in those last 3 months because he was 'not there'. The person who was given those duties worked 100 hour weeks, lost half of their original contract due to on-set duties colliding and at the end they were never paid for their work, they were not credited and they were even ostracized on purpose so the truth would never see the light of day. But that person has receipts just in case people say none of this happened. The entire situation is unfortunate but that's what it was like on the set, at least in that particular moment of filming.
It saddens me a lot to learn more about that. I have a great deal of respect for George Miller as a filmaker, as a storyteller and also as a human being. I'm enormously surprised that KMM behaved like this. I don't know what is more shocking: acting like that and let people unpaid while doing extra-job or the ostracizing aspect of all of this...
User avatar
Immortan Joecutter
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:45 am

Re: From The New York Times: An oral history of 'Fury Road'

Post by Immortan Joecutter »

Taipan wrote:
No, just the last 3 months of the shoot.
I don't know, man.
This means Miller was almost half of the entire time absent during the Namibia shoot in 2012.??

As far as I know Fury Road was filmed in sequence, so some of the following set-photos wouldn't exist if that's the case…
1.jpg
1.jpg (24.43 KiB) Viewed 19387 times
2.jpg
2.jpg (14.82 KiB) Viewed 19387 times
3.jpg
3.jpg (23.21 KiB) Viewed 19387 times
4.jpg
4.jpg (17.64 KiB) Viewed 19387 times
User avatar
Immortan Joecutter
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:45 am

Re: From The New York Times: An oral history of 'Fury Road'

Post by Immortan Joecutter »

5.jpg
5.jpg (28.42 KiB) Viewed 19385 times
6.jpg
6.jpg (11.45 KiB) Viewed 19385 times
7.jpg
7.jpg (14.92 KiB) Viewed 19385 times
henry2
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:53 am

Re: From The New York Times: An oral history of 'Fury Road'

Post by henry2 »

Immortan Joecutter wrote:
Taipan wrote:
No, just the last 3 months of the shoot.
I don't know, man.
This means Miller was almost half of the entire time absent during the Namibia shoot in 2012.??

As far as I know Fury Road was filmed in sequence, so some of the following set-photos wouldn't exist if that's the case…
1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
Yeah, plus I have never heard anywhere that he had a heart attack, or any problems like that.
User avatar
Immortan Joecutter
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:45 am

Re: From The New York Times: An oral history of 'Fury Road'

Post by Immortan Joecutter »

8.jpg
8.jpg (31.52 KiB) Viewed 19384 times
9.jpg
9.jpg (29.87 KiB) Viewed 19384 times
10.jpg
10.jpg (55.67 KiB) Viewed 19384 times
11.jpg
11.jpg (20.84 KiB) Viewed 19384 times
User avatar
Taipan
Posts: 1693
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:14 am
Location: The Wasteland

Re: From The New York Times: An oral history of 'Fury Road'

Post by Taipan »

Immortan Joecutter wrote:
Taipan wrote:
No, just the last 3 months of the shoot.
I don't know, man.
This means Miller was almost half of the entire time absent during the Namibia shoot in 2012.??

As far as I know Fury Road was filmed in sequence, so some of the following set-photos wouldn't exist if that's the case…
1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
I am only relaying information from very trusted sources. I have no business in making stuff up for the sake of it.

When I said that Miller 'wasn't there' I didn't mean he wasn't physically there.
He didn't have a heart attack on set. He had a mental breakdown. Of course he's in the pictures, but it doesn't exactly show what was going on.
I fully trust my sources, it's first hand and no names will be revealed publicly as I promised.
At last the Vermin had inherited the Earth
henry2
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:53 am

Re: From The New York Times: An oral history of 'Fury Road'

Post by henry2 »

Taipan wrote:
Immortan Joecutter wrote:
Taipan wrote:
No, just the last 3 months of the shoot.
I don't know, man.
This means Miller was almost half of the entire time absent during the Namibia shoot in 2012.??

As far as I know Fury Road was filmed in sequence, so some of the following set-photos wouldn't exist if that's the case…
1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
I am only relaying information from very trusted sources. I have no business in making stuff up for the sake of it.

When I said that Miller 'wasn't there' I didn't mean he wasn't physically there.
He didn't have a heart attack on set. He had a mental breakdown. Of course he's in the pictures, but it doesn't exactly show what was going on.
I fully trust my sources, it's first hand and no names will be revealed publicly as I promised.
I didn't mean to question you Taipan. It's just I'm a huge Miller fan and have never heard anything about that. If something like that happened you'd think it would have come out by now.
User avatar
Immortan Joecutter
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:45 am

Re: From The New York Times: An oral history of 'Fury Road'

Post by Immortan Joecutter »

It is no secret that this must have been a very tough shoot, I suppose for almost everyone involved.

Charlize Theron said in an interview that she was very unhappy during filming Fury Road, completely isolated in the desert for six months with nothing around like restaurants, bars, shops or even other people.

Under these circumstances it's not surprising that some of the crew had some sort of downtime/breakdown.
It must have been very stressful, not unlike the current pandemic situation everyone in the world is going through now…
crook.png
crook.png (95.44 KiB) Viewed 19367 times
...and he said, the Revenant was tough to shoot...:lol:
Post Reply