No, she wouldn't be breaking new ground as a female action hero - though a disabled one is fairly unique except for comic effect. But I abosultely think it would be breaking new ground were she a lesbian or identified as bisexual and not in a salacious or comical way. I think sexuality can be an important part of a character even when it doesn't define them, it could quite easily be a motivator for certain decisions and considering Furiosa seems a sympathetic character then that would be quite a remarkable and noteworthy decision by Miller, as the article MWFV8 has just linked states.Mad Max RW wrote:Ripley did have an emotional bond with Newt, the little girl in Aliens. It was further developed in the Director's Cut where it's revealed she had a daughter, Amanda Ripley-McClaren, who died a grandmother while Ripley was in cryo. Then in Alien 3 she got a buzzcut while surrounded by rapists and murderers on an all-male prison planet. The character of Furiosa isn't really breaking new ground and their sexual preference is never questioned or necessary to the story. I'm not sure why in a futuristic post apocalyptic world it would matter. If they can make it work without seeming exploitative or pandering then go for it.
It's like if Batman were gay then he can still be Batman and still have the same motivation for attacking crime but his relationship with Cat Woman would change, his relationship - to an audience - with Robin could be seen as different and so on. The same with Furiosa. Were she to rescue these girls who are been oppressed by a dictotorial male in a seemingly patriarchal society, then what she would come to represent could be different were she in love with one of the girls for example or her reason for been masculinsed when they aren't in that society could have more reasoning behind it.
It's kind of like saying does it matter whether a black male is ever a lead action hero? No, it shouldn't matter but it's culturally significant when it happens and it changes our perception of what is happening. I am reading a lot into it but I'm assuming Miller is putting some level of depth into the film. He certainly has a habit of dealing with homosexuality in Max previously - in both the first and second films.